![]() ![]() Volatility (potential for item to change, or potential for rating to change).Amount of Resources Required (to implement).Degree of Tactical / Strategic Alignment (how well does the item match up to tactical or strategic goals of the organization).Relative Importance / Criticality (to success, to meeting regulatory needs, etc.).Relative Risk (of Implementation, relative to the Cost).Relative Benefit (to the business, customer, revenue etc.).However, the following list has some of the common criteria mentioned in the literature: The criteria can be anything you feel appropriate for evaluating the items to be prioritized. There should be more than one criteria (preferably 3+ to get the most benefit from this process). The Criteria you use for Matrix Prioritization should be relevant to all of the items in your evaluation set. An example of this is included in the How do I do it? section below. However, you could also deal with dependency issues by assigning a dependency criteria to the analysis process for each item that indicates the level of dependency of that item on other items in the set. In addition to being able to be rated on a consistent set of criteria (consistent among all of the items rated, not every time you need to prioritize a set of something), the items should all be at the same level of abstraction so that the rating evaluations are all made using the same approximate level of information.Īdditionally, Karl Wiegers recommends that if specific items in your set are dependent (for example, if you would only consider item X if item Z was included), include only the driving item in the analysis. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |